The answers to these questions are what I broadly call the "Accountability" of the university. It's the Board of Regents' job to judge the effectiveness of university administration. But are any of the regents truly in a position to do that? Do they understand the inner workings of a university well enough to provide a critical evaluation of administration performance?

 

A careful review of Board of Regents meetings will reveal that the board's feedback to university administration is universally positive. Administrators are always praised for their hard work and awesome results. But is all of this praise warranted? Does university administration ever make mistakes? Would the board members have enough understanding of university's function to know if they did?

 

Jim Rogers has the insider knowledge to know that university administration is not above criticism. He also understands that constructive criticism is crucial if administration is to perform at the highest level.

 

Ensuring accountability of university administration is the #1 job of any member of the Board of Regents. Elect Jim Rogers to make sure that university administration will always be held to account by someone who knows when and where they are underperforming!

 

Check in to this page often to see updates on Jim's understanding of university accountability, the problems with the current university accountability, and how Jim will work to make sure the university administration is always accountable to the hard-working residents of the 4th district.